Pride v. State
Pride v. State
53 S.W.3d 619; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1433; 2001 WL 967605
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Pride v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Farrel Gene Pride appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.