Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

Tarro v. Tarro

Tarro v. Tarro
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 11, 2001 · Ahrens, Crane, Dowd
54 S.W.3d 721; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1535; 2001 WL 1035025 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Tarro v. Tarro

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Tarro (Father) appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding child support. Father claims the trial court erred in granting Debra Elaine Tar-ro’s (Mother) motion to modify judgment, which awarded her child support in the amount of $566.59 per month.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons *722for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.