Rulo v. State
Rulo v. State
57 S.W.3d 346; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700; 2001 WL 1155825
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Rulo v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Charles D. Rulo (Movant) appeals the judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.