Palmer v. State
Palmer v. State
58 S.W.3d 625; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1398; 2001 WL 948673
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Palmer v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, Melvis Palmer, (“movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Pike County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and conclude the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.