Schilling v. State
Schilling v. State
62 S.W.3d 439; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1590; 2001 WL 1081405
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Schilling v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Earnest James Schilling appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.