Cain v. State
Cain v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant, Damon Cain, (“movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant sought to vacate his conviction for one count of murder in the second degree, section 565.021, RSMo 1994,
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994, unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.