Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

Cummings v. State

Cummings v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 23, 2001 · Mooney, Simon, Sullivan
70 S.W.3d 465; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 66; 2001 WL 88296 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cummings v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marcus Cummings (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo.R.Crim.P. 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.