McCusker v. State
McCusker v. State
93 S.W.3d 845; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2483; 2002 WL 31866239
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
McCusker v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Joseph McCusker (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would be of no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining *846 the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.