Bailey v. State
Bailey v. State
64 S.W.3d 869; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 63; 2002 WL 46957
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Bailey v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, James Bailey, appeals the denial on the merits of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.