Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002

Martin v. State

Martin v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 26, 2002 · Crahan, Mooney, Sullivan
69 S.W.3d 142; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 372; 2002 WL 262561 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Martin v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Martin (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.151 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2001, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.