Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002

Eidson ex rel. Webster v. Eidson

Eidson ex rel. Webster v. Eidson
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 5, 2002 · Hardwick, Holliger, Ulrich
69 S.W.3d 548; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 416; 2002 WL 337743 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Eidson ex rel. Webster v. Eidson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Eidson (Father) appeals from the trial court’s modification of an Amended Judgment Entry of child support to Martha Webster (Mother) for Keean Eidson (Child). Father claims that the trial court erred in modifying the Amended Judgment Entry for child support because the court, on remand, failed to calculate the presumed correct child support amount under Form 14 and, thus, also failed to determine whether that presumed amount was rebutted as being unjust or inappropriate. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.