ORDER

Movant, Robert Jones, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We previously affirmed Movant’s convictions for unlawful use of a weapon in violation of section 571.030.1(1), RSMo 2000. State v. Jones, 31 S.W.3d 515 (Mo.App. E.D. 2000). He now claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to withdraw because he was a necessary impeachment witness.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude *924the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).