Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002

Gardner v. State

Gardner v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 29, 2002 · Crahan, Mooney, Sullivan
70 S.W.3d 559; 2002 WL 109394 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Gardner v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Jason Gardner appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing.

*560The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.