State v. Brooks
State v. Brooks
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Larry Jerome Brooks (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no jurisprudential purpose. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise stated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.