Reask v. State
Reask v. State
78 S.W.3d 241; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1455; 2002 WL 1419661
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Reask v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Robert Reask (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.