Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002

State v. Domville

State v. Domville
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 27, 2002 · Lowenstein, Newton, Smart
83 S.W.3d 97; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1750; 2002 WL 1967043 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Domville

Opinion of the Court

Order

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Domville appeals his convictions for driving while intoxicated — alcohol — persistent offender, pursuant to § 577.010, RSMo 2000, a class D felony, and for careless and imprudent driving, pursuant to § 304.012, RSMo 2000, a class B misdemeanor.

Domville contends on appeal that the evidence did not support the finding of persistent offender status under § 577.023. After careful consideration of the issue, we affirm the judgment by this summary order. A published opinion would lack juris*98prudential value. Judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.