Marriage of S.L.J. v. R.J.
Marriage of S.L.J. v. R.J.
85 S.W.3d 43; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1495
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Marriage of S.L.J. v. R.J.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
R.J. (“Father”) appeals the judgment denying his motion to modify a dissolution decree and awarding attorney’s fees to S.L.J. (“Mother”). We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. Mother’s motion to dismiss this appeal because Father’s brief is incomplete and argumentative and because Father failed to include a table of cases is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.