Hicklin v. State
Hicklin v. State
87 S.W.3d 335; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1642; 2002 WL 1790620
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Hicklin v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
James Hicklin appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.