Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002

Walmar Investment Co. v. Brunjes

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 20, 2002 · Hoff, III, Russell

87 S.W.3d 349; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1690; 2002 WL 1900075 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Walmar Investment Co. v. Brunjes (Supreme Court of the United States 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walmar Investment Company (Walmar) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying Walmar’s petition for writ of mandamus attempting to compel the City of O’Fallon1 (O’Fallon) to approve Walmar’s proposed site plan absent three conditions imposed by O’Fallon.2

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

. Respondents are all the individual members of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of O’Fallon in their official capacities, as well as the City of O'Fallon. We will refer to them collectively as O’Fallon.

. O'Fallon’s motion to dismiss is herein denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.