Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002

State v. Barmore

State v. Barmore
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 15, 2002 · Crandall, Norton, Sullivan
87 S.W.3d 888; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2096; 2002 WL 31300678 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Barmore

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Scott Barmore (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty as a prior and persistent offender of first-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s ruling on Appellant’s motion to suppress was supported by substantial evidence. State v. Davis, 32 S.W.3d 603, 610 (Mo.App. E.D. 2000). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.