Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002

Kondrick v. Union Electric Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 10, 2002 · Dowd, Hoff, III

88 S.W.3d 113; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1856; 2002 WL 31011860 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Ray Kondrick, et. al (Fox Creek),1 appeal from the trial court’s judgment granting respondents, Union Electric Company, fik/a AMERENUE (UE) and Sprint Communications Company, L.P. (Sprint) motions for summary judgment on Fox Creek’s claims regarding an easement on its common ground. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

. Appellants are members of the Board of Governors of Fox Creek Estates/Dutch Mill Subdivision. We will refer to them Collectively as Fox Creek.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.