Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002

Kirby v. State

Kirby v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 19, 2002 · Crandall, Norton, Sullivan
90 S.W.3d 547; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2271; 2002 WL 31654768 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Kirby v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Esten Kirby, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his plea counsel’s erroneous advice and lack of advice induced him to plead guilty unknowingly and involuntarily.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.