Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant, Richard Thomas (“movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All statutoiy references are to RSMo 1994, unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.