Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002

Buff v. State

Buff v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 10, 2002 · Crandall, Norton, Sullivan
98 S.W.3d 569; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1859; 2002 WL 31011862 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Buff v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John I. Buff (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 Pro Se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence and Judgment (hereinafter Rule 29.15 motion) without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court’s decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2002, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.