Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Gummere v. Gray

Gummere v. Gray
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 7, 2003 · Ahrens, Crahan, Russell
98 S.W.3d 585; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 9; 2003 WL 41879 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Gummere v. Gray

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher R. Gummere and Koreen L. Gummere (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s judgment sustaining a motion for contempt and/or sanctions filed by Steven D. Gray, Delores Gray, Lagrasso Trust, Mary Weindel, Rivercity Realty, Inc., Patricia Blazevich and Davis Properties West, Inc. d/b/a Re/Max Properties West and dismissing Plaintiffs’ third amended petition with prejudice. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.