Wilder v. State
Wilder v. State
99 S.W.3d 62; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 237; 2003 WL 437295
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Wilder v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Ronald Wilder (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant raises two points claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.