Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Little v. State

Little v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 18, 2003 · Ahrens, Russell, Shaw
100 S.W.3d 140; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 377; 2003 WL 1213965 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Little v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Scott L. Little, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends he involuntarily pleaded guilty because his plea counsel told him he would receive the maximum sentence available if he proceeded to trial.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.