Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Ray v. State

Ray v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 18, 2003 · Crandall, Norton, Sullivan
100 S.W.3d 148; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 362; 2003 WL 1215392 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Ray v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lynn Ray appeals from a judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2002, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑