Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

State v. Finerson

State v. Finerson
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 21, 2003 · Dowd, Hoff, III
103 S.W.3d 143; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 41; 2003 WL 139399 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Finerson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael Finerson,1 appeals from the denial of his pro se “Motion to Correct A Manifest Injustice Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.07(d).” We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

. Throughout his pleadings, Defendant spells his surname "Finnerson”.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑