Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Kieffer v. Kieffer

Kieffer v. Kieffer
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 28, 2003 · Dowd, Hoff, III
103 S.W.3d 164; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 96; 2003 WL 179363 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Kieffer v. Kieffer

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Kieffer appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Nancy Kieffer to enforce an oral settlement agreement.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.