Redmond v. State
Redmond v. State
103 S.W.3d 381; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 582; 2003 WL 1961158
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Redmond v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Following an evidentiary hearing, the appellant, Earl Redmond’s, motion for relief under Rule 29.15 was denied. The appellant had been convicted and sentenced as a prior and persistent offender, to concurrent terms of twenty-five years on two counts of first-degree robbery. In his claim for post conviction relief, appellant asserts ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to object when the jury was allowed to see a gun, which was not connected to the crime. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.