Webber v. Jennings
Webber v. Jennings
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
In this action for trespass, the defendants challenge the court’s award of treble damages for the timber and soil defen
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 586 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.