Dixon v. State
Dixon v. State
108 S.W.3d 123; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 871; 2003 WL 21322982
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Dixon v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Elbert Dixon (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant raises three points claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.