Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

State v. Bridges

State v. Bridges
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 10, 2003 · Crahan, Crist, Mooney
108 S.W.3d 129; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 861; 2003 WL 21332716 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Bridges

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Casheme Bridges appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction for trafficking drugs in the second degree, in violation of section 195.223 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.