Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Atkins v. State

Atkins v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 24, 2003 · Hardwick, Howard, Lowenstein
108 S.W.3d 194; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 945; 2003 WL 21469125 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Atkins v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darryl D. Atkins appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Atkins alleges the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because he was *195denied effective assistance of counsel in that counsel misled him into pleading guilty. As a result, Atkins argues his guilty pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑