Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

State v. Henke

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 17, 2003 · Crandall, Norton, Sullivan

108 S.W.3d 726; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 912; 2003 WL 21383924 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Chavez (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Henke (Defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer and resisting arrest. Defendant alleges trial court error in submitting the assault of a law enforcement officer charge to the jury because of insufficiency of the evidence and in not sua sponte declaring a mistrial because of certain testimony. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury might have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer. State v. Shinn, 921 S.W.2d 70, 72-73 (Mo.App. E.D. 1996). We also conclude that the trial court did not plainly err in not sua sponte *727declaring a mistrial. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.