Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Dallas v. Proctor & Gamble Paper Products

Dallas v. Proctor & Gamble Paper Products
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 17, 2003 · Crane, Gaertner, Simon
108 S.W.3d 750; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 903; 2003 WL 21434154 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Dallas v. Proctor & Gamble Paper Products

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jo Ann Dallas (“claimant”) appeals from the unanimous decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, in favor of respondent, the Second Injury Fund, awarding no compensation to claimant. Employer, Proctor and Gamble Paper Products, which settled with claimant, is not a party on appeal. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find the decision is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.