Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Miller v. Miller

Miller v. Miller
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 30, 2003 · Draper, III, Norton, Shaw
109 S.W.3d 224; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1037; 2003 WL 21488886 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Miller v. Miller

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Norman Miller (“Husband”) appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding Kathy Miller (“Wife”) an undivided one-half interest in both parties’ pensions, ordering Husband to not take any action to reduce his retirement benefit and adopting Wife’s appraisal of the couple’s home.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.