Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Jones v. State

Jones v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 18, 2003 · Crandall, Norton, Sullivan
110 S.W.3d 828; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 196; 2003 WL 346931 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Jones v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Jones, Jr. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for postconviction relief. Appellant claims ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo.R.Crim.P 2002, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑