ORDER

Jerry Brandon (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would be of no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).