Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Renner v. State

Renner v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 22, 2003 · Ahrens, Crandall, Mooney
110 S.W.3d 851; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1139; 2003 WL 21692756 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Renner v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James T. Renner (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 on the merits after evidentiary hearing. In his motion, movant claims his guilty plea was involuntarily entered due to ineffective assistance of his counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.