Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

State v. Washington

State v. Washington
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 22, 2003 · Ahrens, Crandall, Mooney
110 S.W.3d 861; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1138; 2003 WL 21692969 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Washington

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Dametrell Washington, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction for second-degree drug trafficking, Section 195.233.3 RSMo 2000. The defendant argues that the trial court erred in (1) imposing judgment and sentence against him due to insufficient evidence and in (2) denying his motion for a new trial because the venire panel saw him in his jail attire. We affirm.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.