Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 22, 2003 · Ahrens, Crandall, Mooney
110 S.W.3d 871; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1548; 2003 WL 21705524 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Johnson v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Johnson appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*872We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.