Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

State v. Pearson

State v. Pearson
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 22, 2003 · Ahrens, Russell, Shaw
111 S.W.3d 428; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 549; 2003 WL 1907829 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Pearson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carl Pearson appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of assault in the third degree. He was ordered to pay a fine of $300. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.