Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Snelling v. Apostle Demoliton, Wrecking & Excavating

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 10, 2003 · Dowd, Hoff, III

111 S.W.3d 502; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 859; 2003 WL 21322981 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Hawkins v. El Paso First Health Plans, Inc. (Tex. App. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling (Appellant) appeals from the following: (1) the trial court’s order granting St. Louis Development Corporation — LRA’s (LRA) motion to dismiss on Count VI of Appellant’s second amended petition; (2) the trial court’s order granting Apostle Demolition, Wrecking and Excavating’s (Apostle) motion to dismiss Counts V and VI of Appellant’s third amended petition; (3) the trial court’s order granting Apostle’s motion for directed verdict on Counts III and IV of *503Appellant’s third amended petition; (4) the judgment of the trial court following a jury trial in favor of Apostle on Counts I and II of Appellant’s third amended petition; (5) the order of the trial court denying Appellant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict; and (6) the order of the trial court denying Appellant’s motions to vacate the verdicts, amend the judgment, and for a new trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.