Hyman v. State
Hyman v. State
112 S.W.3d 117; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1273; 2003 WL 21909561
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Hyman v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Dennis Hyman appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.