Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Newton v. Taylor

Newton v. Taylor
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 19, 2003 · Crane, Hoff, Norton
113 S.W.3d 244; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1320; 2003 WL 21962440 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Newton v. Taylor

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael Taylor, appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his motion to set aside a default judgment. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.