Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

State v. McDowell

State v. McDowell
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 16, 2003 · Ahrens, Crandall, Mooney
116 S.W.3d 697; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1459; 2003 WL 22127897 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. McDowell

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Undra McDowell, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction for class C felony possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202 RSMo. (2000). In his sole point on appeal, the defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial and in denying his motion for a new trial on grounds of alleged juror misconduct.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. We find no abuse of discretion. An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.