Franklin v. State
Franklin v. State
Opinion of the Court
Movant, Seddrick Franklin,
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. In various portions of the Record on Appeal, Movant’s first name is alternatively spelled "Cedrick” or "Ceddrick.”
. Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Missouri Court Rules (2002).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.