Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003

Ouellette Machinery Systems, Inc. v. Clinton Lindburg Cadillac Co.

Ouellette Machinery Systems, Inc. v. Clinton Lindburg Cadillac Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 19, 2003 · Crane, Hoff, Norton
118 S.W.3d 610; 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1316; 2003 WL 21961813 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Ouellette Machinery Systems, Inc. v. Clinton Lindburg Cadillac Co.

Opinion of the Court

*611 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Ouellette Machinery Systems, Inc. appeals from a judgment in its favor on its claim for damages for breach of warranty against General Motors Corporation. It argues that the trial court erred in excluding evidence relating to consequential damages. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.